"Economic independence is the foundation of the only sort of freedom worth a damn." --H.L. Mencken.

Buyer's Remorse

Tuesday, February 09, 2010

I heard about this billboard days ago. I guess some out there thought it was a hoax, but it's real:


But this is truly hilarious:

Many initially thought the picture was a hoax created through Photoshop. But now multiple people have confirmed its existence. The mystery surrounding the billboard quickly morphed from a "Fact or Fiction?" story into a genuine "Whodunit?" Who paid for the ad, and what was their motivation? Are they Obama supporters sarcastically hoping to remind disgruntled liberals about how things were under Bush, or are they Bush supporters sincerely hoping to remind voters of the past administration?

To get some answers, Yahoo! News tracked down Mary McNamara, the general manager at the Minneapolis office of Schubert & Hoey Outdoor Advertising, the company which owns and leases out the billboard space.

"The ad was purchased by a group of small business owners who wish to remain anonymous," McNamara said. However, McNamara did offer this political bombshell: "Some of the people in the group who paid for this were Obama supporters." [emphasis mine]
I can't help but laugh.

In Case Of Emergency, Party!

Monday, February 08, 2010

I love Superbowl commercials. I don't know why the companies that air these hilarious commercials don't make commercials like that all year long. I'd probably be inclined to watch more of them then.

Of all of yesterday's Superbowl commercials, this one is my favorite:



If the world is going to end, party! If the world is not going to end... party!

Makes sense to me!

Boredom Is Unhealthy

Sunday, February 07, 2010

I saw this headline on the Drudge Report this morning and found it amusing - good thing I did, it turns out:

You really can be bored to death, scientists discover

"Boredom could be shaving years off your life, scientists have found.

Researchers say that people who complain of boredom are more likely to die young, and that those who experienced 'high levels' of tedium are more than two-and-a-half times as likely to die from heart disease or stroke than those satisfied with their lot."


[ Click here to read full article ]

It makes sense to me. During those periods of time of my life where I had a tedious, uninteresting job I was not in the best of health. I agree with Aristotle's thinking that the telos (ultimate purpose) of human existence is happiness, which is more than just a mere emotion, but without going into the full details of his thoughts it suffices to say that being bored does not move one closer to that ideal, and when out of alignment with it a human being suffers mentally and physically.

The Jobs Bill That Will Get You Fired

Saturday, February 06, 2010

You've probably been hearing about a "bipartisan" jobs bill that is the latest D.C. fix for our nation's employment woes. It may help out some unemployed unskilled workers, but it may mean that currently employed unskilled workers should familiarize themselves with the location of their local unemployment office.

Why? It's all about something called, "perverse incentive":

A perverse incentive is an incentive that has an unintended and undesirable effect, that is against the interest of the incentive makers. Perverse incentives by definition produce negative unintended consequences.
What I am specifically referring to in this case is this feature of the proposed bill:

The tax break for hiring unemployed workers would exempt companies from paying the employer's share of Social Security payroll taxes for new workers hired this year, as long as those people had been unemployed at least 60 days. It would save companies 6.2 percent of the new workers' salaries that are subject to Social Security taxes, and would cost about $11 billion over 10 years.
...and this:

The senators hope to unveil legislation as early as Monday that would...extend unemployment payments for those whose benefits have run out, and renew a program that offers the jobless a subsidy for health insurance premiums.
[ Click here to read the quoted article ]

Unless this proposed legislation also stipulates that there must be an increase in the total number of employees a company has to take advantage of the payroll tax break, then folks who perform unskilled labor are probably going to be let go and replaced with workers who can easily be trained to do the same job, but who will cost the employer 6.2% less. (This could be true of folks who work in skilled trades, but will probably occur less frequently.) Coupled with the expanded jobless benefits proposed in the bill, employers will be spared a bit of moral discomfort for letting people go to take advantage of the lower payroll taxes.

The only way this will lead to a gain in employment nationally is if an economic recovery comes along with it. Otherwise, all this will create is employment insecurity for people who otherwise were secure in their jobs!

Too Late To Apologize... King George

Friday, February 05, 2010

Rapid Fire Forex

Thursday, February 04, 2010

Bad jobs numbers, mounting Federal debt, European debt woes and other distressing economic reports caused a Yen rally this morning that I happened to witness. I was in a position to take advantage of this by shorting the Australian dollar versus the Yen, which I did and with great results: I made a little over 1% on my account in under 30 minutes. I was definitely happy with that, but what I was most happy about was how I did it.

In general, my method is to trade a set number of units of whichever currency I am working with at the time when I think I see an entry signal. For me, Bollinger bands are primarily where I find my signals, which are simply the first candle to open and close within the high or low band after a run that takes the candles outside of the bands; I trade reversals, basically. I set take profit orders on all of my trades, and my targets are previous support and resistance points, which I look for simply by seeing where the candles hit either one in the past. Since I am entering after runs have occurred, I look at past resistance as likely being new support, so I target that, and vice versa.

The system works. I hit my trading target most weeks (a 2.5% increase in the account balance, starting from the balance on Sunday morning), and weeks in which I fall short typically get made up for in subsequent weeks when I score much higher than my target.

One thing I've not liked about my method, however, are the "air balls" - times when the price action moves in my favor, but the action runs out of gas before it reaches my take profit order. I came up with the idea to sort of "hedge" my trades a little bit by splitting up each trade into smaller, equal parts, and stacking take profit orders for each of them between the starting point and what I think the ultimate target should be. For example, if I think AUD/JPY long looks hot at 78.5, and I think it can get to 79, if I were trading 10,000 units I would put in 4 entries of 2500 units each, with take profit orders at 78.7, 78.8, 78,9, and 79. That way if I'm right, I profit and each position is closed out. I give up a bit of profit compared to what I would get hitting 79 with the full 10,000 units, but if I'm wrong - say that the price only gets as far as 78.95 -  I at least get some profit and some of my capital is free to be used again.

This is definitely not what I would describe as an "elegant" trading method. Indeed, it's actually pretty sloppy and I imagine that most traders would turn their noses up at it. I say that because one of its major flaws is that it does cause losing positions to be created that can hang out in the account for a long time. I tolerate unrealized losses in my portfolio, which I doubt most traders do, basically because I keep each position small relative to the total account and I know from experience that losing positions eventually turn back into winners again. I also take care not to trade multiple crossings of major currencies in the same direction all at once - if I'm trading EUR/JPY long, I won't also trade AUD/JPY long, I look to AUD/JPY as a potential short if EUR/JPY turns against me instead. Ugly though my method might be to some, the basic version of it I used between June 1st and December 31st of last year allowed me to rack up 81% in gains. Sure looks pretty to me!

The title of this post then is actually not about this method, though it does describe what using this method this morning was like. As AUD/JPY plummeted, I was making entries with take profit orders stacked every ten pips. At one point they were being cashed out as fast as I entered them, so I just kept moving them down. When the move finally stopped, I switched over the EUR/JPY and did the same thing on the long side. Rapid fire, very fun. I'm looking forward to the next time.

Taxed By The Tax Code

Wednesday, February 03, 2010

For several days I've been trying to answer what I think should be a simple question: if I have a SIMPLE IRA through my employer, and a Traditional IRA aside from that, do contributions to my SIMPLE plan reduce the annual contribution limit of my Traditional, or are they treated separately? If they do affect each other, how much? (I'm not talking about deduction phase outs, I only mean the contribution limit).

I can't find an answer to this anywhere. The broker my employer goes through for our SIMPLE plan doesn't even know. Awesome.

I've been trying to figure this out because I want to contribute to both of my plans to bring down my taxable income. However, I can't find this information, and that's even after reading through IRS publications on the various IRA account types.

I guess I'll just focus on maxing out my HSA plan every year, and maybe increase my SIMPLE contributions after that. I do at least know that the annual contribution caps of HSA plans are not affected by contributions to IRA accounts.

Does anyone out there know the answer to this?

Disclosure Policy
jenna jameson chasey lain tera patrick briana banks sunny leone lanny barby stefani morgan savanna samson monique alexander cassidey